Wednesday, March 29, 2006

Superheroes. Simple Acts


It's been quite a week here at the Planet. Don't want to bore you with specifics but when the bosses are stressed, you're stressed. And then you get annoyed. And then you make mistakes and feel like a total loser. And when you feel like a real loser, the best thing to do is to go and get inspired, so where do you go?
Me? I go to the comic books. (yes even people who live in METROPOLIS read comic books) So I picked up my stack and read. And it got me to thinking about this whole "hero debate" that was waged last week. Sure, recent controversies by my good friend the DoG have overshadowed the whole discussion, and The Urban Barbarian's entire argument has mysteriously vanished. But I can't stop trying to pinpoint what, exactly, constitutes a hero.
Was the Barbarian right? Was I trying to dilute the word so that I could live out some superhero fantasy of my own? I'm a nice guy...I'm "kind" (mostly). Was I equating heroism with kindness to wrap myself in an invisible cape of delusion?

Man that's depressing...

When you need the answer to a particularly vexing question you go to the smartest man around. There ain't nobody smarter than Mr. Reed Richards of The Fantastic Four. And it was in the pages of Fantastic Four that I found an answer.

The Fantastic Four are unquestionably heroes. They have saved the world, the galaxy and even a few neighboring dimensions on multiple occasions. And in this particular issue, Reed Richards aka Mr. Fantastic and his wife, Susan Richards aka The Invisible Woman, reminded me what it is I love most about heroes. And there wasn't anything particularly "Super" about it.

It all starts as an employee of the Baxter Building (where the FF live and work) approaches her boss, Sue Richards, and asks to speak to her in private. Turns out, this woman is being sexually abused at home by her husband. She doesn't know what to do. She's a brilliant lawyer, but her husband is a prosecutor and knows full well she won't be able to prove anything. And she's scared to just leave. Scared of what he will do. The woman has nowhere to go, so she goes to her boss, who happens to be a superhero. Sue knows this is out of the typical "hero" area. There's no alien to hit or supervillainous plot to foil. But Sue takes the woman home and she confronts the husband. She tells him that his wife is leaving him and moving into the Baxter Building. She tells him that he won't contest the divorce. And she tells him that she will be watching him and can do things to him he doesn't even want to think about. After sending the woman back to the Baxter Building she tries to call Reed. But he isn't answering his cell.

Why? Because Reed is at the hospital. About a year ago Reed was on his way back from a cosmic adventure when he saw a man on the ledge of a building. He spoke to the man and found out he had terminal cancer and no one left to live for. He didn't want to die a slow death alone so figured he'd end it now. So Reed Richards, Superhero and supergenius, gave the man his phone number. Promised him he wouldn't be alone. Promised this man that he would be there for him. And that's where he was. Sitting in the hospital with this man. Holding his hand so he wouldn't have to live his last hours on Earth without some kind of human contact.

And that's it. That's the whole story. Aside from Sue using some of those invisible force fields on the pig of a husband and Reed stretching his arms to check the dying man's IV there was no superheroic action. Just two human beings helping two other human beings.

Some people HATE these kinds of superhero stories. I Love them. Because as much as I love some good, old fashioned superhero ass kickin, what I love MOST is what these modern day gods represent. They represent selflessness.

Sue and Reed weren't in any danger in this issue. Their lives weren't threatened. The only thing sacrificed by either of them was their time. But they both acted selflessly, the showed kindness and compassion, and their actions were noble.

I put down the comic. And I was inspired. Because I can't lift a car, I can't shoot lazerbeams from my eyes and as much as I wish I could, I can't fly. But I can be selfless, I can be kind, and I can show compassion. Nobility is within my reach, as it is with any of us.

So am I living out some fantasy? Sure, maybe I am. But it's a fantasy where we can all be heroic all day long. We can create a world where nobility is the norm and not the exception. Where acts of selflessness and compassion really DO become commonplace. That's all I want. I mean, who doesn't want to live in a world where we can all be like Reed and Sue Richards: where we can all be Fantastic!

Check out the comic, even if you aren't a regular geek like me. Fantastic Four #28 Private Lives, Public Faces.

30 Comments:

Blogger That's Ms. Thing To You said...

I love you, Clark Kent.

5:37 PM  
Blogger UrbanBarbarian said...

Sounds to me like the FF took a day off of being heroes and were Good Samaritans. Kind people.

It doesn't take a hero to sit with a dying man so he isn't alone. It takes someone with compassion. It doesn't take courage. It takes kindness. For some reason, you want both words [ hero and Good Samaritan or Kind Person ] to mean the same thing. They each have separate, unique definitions.

Sorry neither Reed or Sue were being heroes.

BUT, at times they have. Just because you HAVE been a hero doesn't mean that every act you do is heroic. Some are kind, selfless acts and those fall into a different category.

8:35 PM  
Blogger UrbanBarbarian said...

I do whole heartedly support your goal to be fantastic though.

No one can argue that your heart isn't in the right place and I believe kindness can be very inspirational and motivating. Go Mikey Go!

10:23 PM  
Blogger Norm said...

I was pondering this dilemma the other day when I remembered these words of wisdom from my childhood.

Well, there are all kinds of heroes, you know.
A man can get to be a hero for a famous battle he fought;
Or by studying very hard and becoming a weightless astronaut.
And then there are heroes of other sorts.
Like the heroes we know from watching sports.
But a hero doesn't have to be a grown up person, you know.
A hero can be a very big dog who comes to your rescue,
Or a very little boy who's smart enough to know what to do.


For a little taste of nostalgia: School House Rock's "Zero, My Hero."

Now I know it was written by a bunch of fucking hippies who just wanted everyone to love one another other, but, at least you're not alone, Mikey.

11:40 PM  
Blogger UrbanBarbarian said...

Still, even if you use most of that as a reference point - one of the main, most important, ingredients is courage. Yes, it takes brains to be an astronaut but it also takes courage to boldly go where no man/woman has gone before.
But I don't question that Mikey is not alone in that he appreciates and strives for a more noble existence. That's wonderful. I just wish that doing so didn't mean he is heroic for his efforts or ideals. In some cases, it's merely Polite...

6:12 AM  
Blogger Rapp said...

Can we take a moment here and define exactly what "Fantastic" means? Because as much as I love Reed Richards, I wouldn't call him fantastic. Amazing? Sure. Astounding? Maybe. Truth be told, he's even a little upsetting at times. But "fantastic?" C'mon, let's not demean the word by throwing it around so cavalierly.

11:55 AM  
Blogger Last Son of Krypton said...

What really IS so Fantastic about the fantastic four? I mean...they're heroes. But in a world where you have Wolverine, Storm, Spidey and Captain frickin America...are they really all that Fantastic? Or heroic? What ARE these words!?!?!?!?

12:00 PM  
Blogger Last Son of Krypton said...

And I also have to point out that, again, Dan is honing in on ONE aspect of heroism. Dragging the musty dictionary out ONCE AGAIN it says that a hero is someone who is noted for "feats of courage OR nobility of purpose" That's an "or" NOT an "and". And yes, sitting with a dying person to give them comfort and ease their pain IS nobility of purpose.

12:29 PM  
Blogger TTBitches said...

I think the Fantastic 4 are a bunch of pussies. Their movie sucked and they can't do anything alone.

There are also a lot of WORDS in that last post. I don't agree with that.

12:30 PM  
Blogger UrbanBarbarian said...

Which dictionary defines it as "nobility of purpose"? That doesn't ring true. Please. Is this the Vogel Dictionary? I looked up the word in the ol' Websters and my very own Microsoft Word and I don't recall Nobility of Purpose... Sounds hokey.

1:02 PM  
Blogger UrbanBarbarian said...

Kindness is the Relish in a Sandwich.

A Sandwich has two MAIN ingredients. Some kind of meat/veggie and bread. It becomes a sandwich. You can add relish to it but it's still a sandwich. Now it's just tastier to some.

Relish alone is not a Sandwich.

Relish does have some indgredients all by itself. Just like Kindness.

Why must you insist on expanding the defination of Kindness to include Heroism?

Relish does not equal Sandwich.

1:09 PM  
Blogger Rapp said...

Not to throw another wrench into the works, but here are a couple things I think you have to take into account when defining a hero: Ability and motivation.
I don't know if a hero necessarily has to try to do something that may be beyond his or her ability, but I think that aspect definitely makes it more heroic. Take Sue Richards (nee Storm) in the tale Mikey related to us. I think even the barbarian (in a previous post that has since been deleted and he may therefore deny the existence of) said standing up to an abusive someone was heroic. But Sue's abilities are such that going into this confrontation she knows this guy is no threat to her and she can kick his ass. So that dulls the heroism quotient in my eyes. If the woman stood up to her husband alone, or someone non-fantastic (don't get me started) stood up for her, I think they would both be more heroic than Sue. I mean, is it heroic for Supes to go fly off and bash a comet off its path so it doesn't hit Earth? It saves lots of people and its a selfless act, but c'mon, he knows he can do it. Where's the sacrifice? It's like me opening a jar of peanut butter (on a good day). Hooray!
Secondly, motivation. Now, let's take your Guy Gardner. Guy Gardner back when I used to read about him. Could he save people? Yeah. Beat bad guys, make the world a better place? Yeah. He could do any number of heroic deeds, but to me he was never a hero because his actions always came from a selfish place. If you run into a burning building and save a little girl is that heroic? Yes. But are you a hero if you saved that girl because she was holding your honorable mention spelling bee trophy from third grade (which is what you really went back in for) and wouldn't let go of it?
Just food for thought. And lots of words to plague ttbitches.

1:16 PM  
Blogger Norm said...

I really hope Dave starts a blog called "The Rapp" because it just makes sense.

He makes another good case as to why Batman and DD are better heros (and characters) than Superman (oh, boy, I feel another debate comming).

And I've decided, at least in my own head, to stop calling the FF 'Fantastic' and start calling them 'Fabulous'. I think it suits them better.

1:32 PM  
Blogger That's Ms. Thing To You said...

My dictionary doesn't have "nobility of purpose," but it does have "noble qualities" as part of the definition of a hero.

From the Merriam-Webster online dictionary:

1 a : a mythological or legendary figure often of divine descent endowed with great strength or ability b : an illustrious warrior c : a man admired for his achievements and noble qualities d : one that shows great courage
2 a : the principal male character in a literary or dramatic work b : the central figure in an event, period, or movement
3 plural usually heros : SUBMARINE 2
4 : an object of extreme admiration and devotion : IDOL

By this definition, Clay Aiken may very well be someone's hero.

2:04 PM  
Blogger UrbanBarbarian said...

So PART of the definition is "AND a man of noble quality". Noble Purpose isn't mention and alone isn't the definition. Notice the key word "and". Many ingredients make up this definition. To have ONE does not equal ALL.

2:20 PM  
Blogger Norm said...

Unless you are a Buddhist.

2:56 PM  
Blogger Last Son of Krypton said...

Wait. I just wanna make sure I have this right. Not ONLY Has Dan said that I am trying to change the definition to live out my own hero fantasy, but he has now called me a liar because my dictionary doesn't match his. Is that right? Go to Dictionary.com and type in hero. That's where the "or" came from.

Now. Josh and Rapp bring up interesting points regarding the "Supers" of the hero arena. If great courage or doing something beyond your means becomes the criteria, then MOST of the heroes we grew up with cease to be very heroic at all. Because they're right. Superman, Green Lantern, Wonder Woman, Captain America...these guys can wipe the floor with almost anyone. I mean, Wolverine has a HEALING FACTOR for crying out loud. What kinda courage do you need when you know you CAN'T BE KILLED!?
That's not to say that they HAVEN'T shown great courage. And that's not to say that courage isn't (obviously) a major factor when it comes to defining a hero. All I'm saying is it isn't the ONLY factor. There are as many ways to be a hero as there are characters in comic books.

And one more thought. Why do we put SUPER in front of HERO to get Superhero? Becuase there are MANY LEVELS of heroism. From Super on down to the guy at Ralphs. It doesn't dilute the word to include all aspects of it. It just inspires others to put there best foot forward.

So there.

3:00 PM  
Blogger John Kane said...

Well well welly well. Hero. Hero. Hero. First of all I wanna say there are some excellent points brought up by you all on what is obviously a multi sided argument. I have to say first of all I don't care what a dictionary says, HERO is a perspective thing. Anyone can be a HERO to anyone. They can be super as well without powers. I find myself agreeing with Rapp here (and aint that a scary thought) but a hero is one who goes beyond his/her abilities or powers. And I agree with the doG that DD and Bats are better examples of heroes than the big blue Boy Scout (and not just because they are the only ones that help out in the minority sections of their towns). But Superman when he died became a hero in my book because he faced what could not be beaten and died trying to destroy it. Bats and DD know that they could die any day. And that is my definition, if you confront something that is bigger and more powerful than you and do it to save more than just yourself. Well then you are a hero. Period.

I am in that camp of not liking these type of superhero stories because they always solve everything too easily. That woman should have stood on her own two feet and confronted the guy. Also by Sue getting involved will she constantly be there to help this woman all the time. Being a hero is not confined to one act. It is many acts and the upkeep. That is key. Upkeep. Men who sacrificed their body parts or lives for this country are heroes. But if after they come home, they start wanting to restrict freedoms or the principles they just fought for then they are no longer heroes.

But at the end of the day these are comic book characters that live in a fantasy world drawn made by artists and writers from their own heads. The reality is alot more harsher and harder. Heroes are hard to come by in this world and are easily torn apart because they don't live up to what we want all the time. Thats the sad truth.

3:54 PM  
Blogger TTBitches said...

The only books I want to read are from published authors.

The rest of you can go to hell.

4:23 PM  
Blogger Reno said...

Although, I have to say, I'm not all that impressed with our Fantastic Friends in their latest adventure and I'd put their actions pretty low on the old hero scale, they certainly qualify under the definitions of hero so graciously provided by ms. thing.

They are the principle characters in a literary work or drama (definition 2) And they are an object of extreme admiration and devotion (definition 4)

Just the fact that Mikey admires them technically makes them heroes according to definition 4.

If our Barbarous friend is interested solely in the dictionairy defintion, then, it seems to me he has lost his point.

Not qualifying under definition number 1 does not make the other definitions invalid.

For instance, I can call Mikey a "Fag" or I can smoke a "Fag" but that doesn't mean. My pack of Camels is Gay and it doesn't mean that the editor of the Daily Planet is made out of tobacco. (Although I wish he was)

5:31 PM  
Blogger Last Son of Krypton said...

Of course, calling said Editor a "fag" leads us back into Mr. DoG's Blog doesn't it? Cuz Maybe Mr. Editor doesn't WANT to be called a fag under EITHER definition because it offends him.

But then again...looking at Steve's blog that Editor would have to look at the truth UNDERNEATH the word wouldn't he? In which case he would be grateful that the point was supporting his view on the whole hero front...

Sigh...all this blogging makes my head hurt.

6:05 PM  
Blogger UrbanBarbarian said...

First of all, none of you are right. I am. I generally always am. I know a lot of you hate that but it's true. Unless you agree with me 100% I sincerely pity you. Especially on this topic. The day the guy at Ralphs is a hero for giving someone a penny is the day we need to invent a new word for what hero used to be. So sad, my little sucklings, so sad. Today the word "hero" has died a small death. Thanks LSOK & his sycophantic friends, you killed a word today. I hope you're all happy.

Secondly, Batman and DD make much better superheroes than Superman. He's just too super.

6:39 PM  
Blogger UrbanBarbarian said...

Yes, according to Reno or Remo Williams, mere silly definitions don't really define words at all. I can say Cheeseburger and it can really mean trash can if enough intellectuals on a blog space deem it so.

6:43 PM  
Blogger K-Mo said...

You all talk, way to f'ing much.

7:25 PM  
Blogger Norm said...

Technically, this ain't talking. If we actually talked more, we wouldn't need all these fucking blogs.

1:08 AM  
Blogger UrbanBarbarian said...

Hi Wonderful People,
Since everyone has started a blog in the last two weeks or so I've decided to link everyone up to my older blog at http://senseidarrel.blogspot.com/

I generally use the Urban Barbarian blog for my evil artistic purposes. When I'm not commenting on Clark's Blog I try to draw pictures.

9:31 AM  
Blogger UrbanBarbarian said...

Out of pure love for Scandanavia, I have removed the cartoon blog and wiped it from existence.

I look forward to learning what kind of a hero the milkman is today. Teach me.

9:46 AM  
Blogger UrbanBarbarian said...

Looks like Lexcorp has shut down the Planet...! ;)

1:15 PM  
Blogger Last Son of Krypton said...

What the hell are you talkin about?

11:44 AM  
Blogger UrbanBarbarian said...

You hadn't posted anything in days. I think Lexcorp snuck a virus in your Daily Planet and things shut down.

That's what!

6:57 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home